<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple vs. Adobe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe</link>
	<description>Home Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:41:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: manjyoumethunder</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3093</link>
		<dc:creator>manjyoumethunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3093</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@AppleSoldier 

 ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @AppleSoldier 

Will you stop saying Flash is only a visual design language you god moron? You don&#039;t know about programming, Flash, or anything related to the inner workings of computers.

You&#039;re a poser. Get a life. People who can really program like me and MrBit don&#039;t give a what language people want to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@AppleSoldier </p>
<p> &#8230;</b> <br /> @AppleSoldier </p>
<p>Will you stop saying Flash is only a visual design language you god moron? You don&#8217;t know about programming, Flash, or anything related to the inner workings of computers.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re a poser. Get a life. People who can really program like me and MrBit don&#8217;t give a what language people want to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sn0le</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>sn0le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@mrbit10:
Time will ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @mrbit10:
Time will show.
At least Apple is really giving lots of ammunition to anti-Apple people.
But, all is fair in love and war I guess.

It will be very interesting to follow the development of this.

Btw, it seems like most of the large computer-related companies are starting to pick fights with eachother.
It&#039;s beginning to remind me of christmas at home, lol.
Everyone is happy for a few days, and soon everyone is fighting over stupid things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@mrbit10:<br />
Time will &#8230;</b> <br /> @mrbit10:<br />
Time will show.<br />
At least Apple is really giving lots of ammunition to anti-Apple people.<br />
But, all is fair in love and war I guess.</p>
<p>It will be very interesting to follow the development of this.</p>
<p>Btw, it seems like most of the large computer-related companies are starting to pick fights with eachother.<br />
It&#8217;s beginning to remind me of christmas at home, lol.<br />
Everyone is happy for a few days, and soon everyone is fighting over stupid things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbit10</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3095</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbit10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3095</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@sn0le i think its ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @sn0le i think its more personal as the change in OS4 was changed of recent, there are tons of apps built by 3rd party compilers that run fine.  Adobe can yet again circumvent the change by adding more to their api for an xcode signature.  Then if apple responds again to that move, you will know its personal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@sn0le i think its &#8230;</b> <br /> @sn0le i think its more personal as the change in OS4 was changed of recent, there are tons of apps built by 3rd party compilers that run fine.  Adobe can yet again circumvent the change by adding more to their api for an xcode signature.  Then if apple responds again to that move, you will know its personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbit10</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbit10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@coolass222 what ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @coolass222 what about everyone else?  whether the start code is actionScript or C#, legally how is that not a dbl standard?  what security do you refer to?  an app made by adobe toolkit is objective-C or iphone code, how is it less secure exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@coolass222 what &#8230;</b> <br /> @coolass222 what about everyone else?  whether the start code is actionScript or C#, legally how is that not a dbl standard?  what security do you refer to?  an app made by adobe toolkit is objective-C or iphone code, how is it less secure exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HaywardJack</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>HaywardJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@mrbit10 The CS ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @mrbit10 The CS software is not buggy during my experiences [Which are limited] but instead noticeably heavy on the system they could make the software a lot lighter and they could do the same with the PDF software [Acrobat &amp; Reader], especially Adobe Reader which is a relatively large program for the task it needs to perform. Adobe needs to stop focusing on features and start focusing on the end users experience things like, performance, usability and simplicity. This comment continues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@mrbit10 The CS &#8230;</b> <br /> @mrbit10 The CS software is not buggy during my experiences [Which are limited] but instead noticeably heavy on the system they could make the software a lot lighter and they could do the same with the PDF software [Acrobat &amp; Reader], especially Adobe Reader which is a relatively large program for the task it needs to perform. Adobe needs to stop focusing on features and start focusing on the end users experience things like, performance, usability and simplicity. This comment continues&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbit10</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbit10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@HaywardJack  well ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @HaywardJack  well said.  Do you find the CS software to be buggy as well??  Or their PDF software?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@HaywardJack  well &#8230;</b> <br /> @HaywardJack  well said.  Do you find the CS software to be buggy as well??  Or their PDF software?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HaywardJack</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3091</link>
		<dc:creator>HaywardJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3091</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@mrbit10 ...Apple ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @mrbit10 ...Apple has been used to controlling every last aspect of there &quot;experience&quot; and they need to learn that as there market share and customer base grows they need to become more tolerant for other companies software and hardware or they will risk loosing money, market share, customers and developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@mrbit10 &#8230;Apple &#8230;</b> <br /> @mrbit10 &#8230;Apple has been used to controlling every last aspect of there &#8220;experience&#8221; and they need to learn that as there market share and customer base grows they need to become more tolerant for other companies software and hardware or they will risk loosing money, market share, customers and developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HaywardJack</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3092</link>
		<dc:creator>HaywardJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@mrbit10 I would ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @mrbit10 I would get rid of Adobe because there software is so buggy and unreliable, Flash is a horrible piece of software which has been left to take over the web. I mean I can understand why Apple wants developers to use there development toolkits - at the end of the day Apple is a company and it want&#039;s to take advantage of every opportunity it has to make more money. Getting developers to use Mac OS X will help them gain market share. This comment continues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@mrbit10 I would &#8230;</b> <br /> @mrbit10 I would get rid of Adobe because there software is so buggy and unreliable, Flash is a horrible piece of software which has been left to take over the web. I mean I can understand why Apple wants developers to use there development toolkits &#8211; at the end of the day Apple is a company and it want&#8217;s to take advantage of every opportunity it has to make more money. Getting developers to use Mac OS X will help them gain market share. This comment continues&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbit10</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3085</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbit10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3085</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@michaelovesrh you ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @michaelovesrh you might be on something here, i would agree more with you if it were not for the last minute change to OS 4.  So will these new toolkits you propose also replace unity, lua and etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@michaelovesrh you &#8230;</b> <br /> @michaelovesrh you might be on something here, i would agree more with you if it were not for the last minute change to OS 4.  So will these new toolkits you propose also replace unity, lua and etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbit10</title>
		<link>http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe/comment-page-1#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbit10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnaboutseek.com/home-technology/apple-vs-adobe#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@HaywardJack yea i ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; @HaywardJack yea i have an older vid on adobe where i state i think photoshop was very heavy on the system.  again well stated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@HaywardJack yea i &#8230;</b> <br /> @HaywardJack yea i have an older vid on adobe where i state i think photoshop was very heavy on the system.  again well stated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

